- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-81/14: Order of the General Court of 1 August 2014 — Energy Brands v OHIM — Smart Wines (SMARTWATER) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0081
62014TB0081
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.10.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 361/9
(Case T-81/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 361/10
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Energy Brands, Inc. (Atlanta, United States) (represented by: D. Stone and R. Allos, Solicitors)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Smart Wines GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: I. Schwarz, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2013 (case R 903/2013-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Energy Brands, Inc. and Smart Wines GmbH.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant, the defendant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.