I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-362/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the carrying out of an industrial project in an area protected under Directive 92/43/EEC - Documents originating from a Member State - Objection on the part of the Member State - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the economic policy of a Member State - Article 4(5) to (7) of Regulation No 1049/2001)
2011/C 55/36
Language of the case: English
Applicant: IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Crosby, Solicitor and S. Santoro, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. O’Reilly and P. Costa de Oliveira, Agents)
Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by J. Bering Liisberg and B. Weis Fogh, Agents); Republic of Finland (represented initially by J. Heliskoski, M. Pere and H. Leppo, and later by J. Heliskoski, Agents); and Kingdom of Sweden (represented by K. Petkovska, A. Falk and S. Johannesson, Agents)
Annulment of the Commission’s decision of 19 June 2008 partly refusing to grant the applicant access to certain documents transmitted to the Commission by the German authorities in connection with a procedure for the declassification of a site protected under Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.