- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-94/16: Action brought on 1 March 2016 — Sheridan v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0094
62016TN0094
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.4.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 145/33
(Case T-94/16)
(2016/C 145/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Gavin Sheridan (Midleton, Ireland) (represented by: N. Pirc Musar, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul decision A(2015)13844 C of the European Parliament of 14 January 2016 rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to certain documents relating to information on Members’ of the European Parliament travel expenses, subsistence allowances, general expenditure allowances and staffing arrangements expenses;
—order the Parliament to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to Articles 134 and 140 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, including the costs of any intervening parties.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-639/15, Psara v Parliament (OJ 2016 C 48, p. 53).