- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-567/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 5 November 2013 — Nóra Baczó and János István Vizsnyiczai v Raiffeisen Bank Zrt.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0567
62013CN0567
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.3.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/2
(Case C-567/13)
(2014/C 71/02)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Nóra Baczó, János István Vizsnyiczai
Defendant: Raiffeisen Bank Zrt.
Questions referred
1.In proceedings brought before a local court for a declaration of the invalidity of a contract (standard contract terms), in which the consumer also seeks in his application a declaration of the unfairness of a term of the contract at issue in the proceedings, and thereby provides a basis for the jurisdiction of another court, the county court (törvényszék), is there a disadvantage for the consumer, given that, in proceedings brought by the other party to the contract, the consumer can rely on the unfairness of a contract term (1) before the local court, and transfer to the county court burdens the consumer with higher costs?
2.Would the situation be more equal if, in proceedings brought by the consumer before the local court for a declaration of the invalidity of a contract, the consumer were able also to rely on the unfairness of a term of the contract, as a result of which that local court would have jurisdiction?
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts; OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.