- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-176/10: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Seven v OHIM — Seven For All Mankind (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND — Earlier Community and international figurative marks containing the word element seven — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0176
62010TA0176
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.11.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/18
(Case T-176/10)(1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND - Earlier Community and international figurative marks containing the word element ‘seven’ - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 340/35
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by: L. Trevisan, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Seven For All Mankind LLC (Vernon, California, United States) (represented by: A. Gautier-Sauvagnac, lawyer, B. Guimberteau, lawyer, M. Choukroun, lawyer)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 January 2010 (Case R 1514/2008-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Seven SpA and Seven For All Mankind LLC.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 January 2010 (Case R 1514/2008-2);
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders OHIM to pay the costs incurred by Seven SpA in the proceedings before the General Court and those incurred by Seven SpA for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
4.Orders Seven For All Mankind LLC to bear its own costs.
OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.