- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012. # Criminal proceedings against Wojciech Ziemski et Andrzej Kozak. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Sąd Rejonowy w Zakopanem - Poland. # Reference for a preliminary ruling - No description of the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility. # Case C-31/12.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:627
62012CO0031
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Reference for a preliminary ruling – No description of the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context – Manifest inadmissibility (Art 267 TFEU) (see paras 6, 7, operative part.)
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Sąd Rejonowy w Zakopanem – Interpretation of the concept of ‘technical regulation’ in Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37), as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998 (OJ 1998 L 217, p. 18) – Obligation on the part of a Member State to communicate to the Commission all draft technical regulations – Law of a Member State concerning games of chance.
Operative part
The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Zakopanem (Poland), by decision of 13 January 2012, is manifestly inadmissible.