EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-83/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — AL v Commission (Civil service — Special advisers — Appointment to the post of representative of the European Union in an international partnership body — Appointment of another representative of the European Union — Legitimate expectations — Right to be heard — Principle of good administration and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials — Liability)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0083

62019TA0083

June 10, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.7.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/9

(Case T-83/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Civil service - Special advisers - Appointment to the post of representative of the European Union in an international partnership body - Appointment of another representative of the European Union - Legitimate expectations - Right to be heard - Principle of good administration and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials - Liability)

(2020/C 247/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: AL (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Vernier and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision implicitly rejecting the applicant’s claim for compensation of 19 December 2017 and of the decision of 12 November 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint and, secondly, compensation of the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders AL to pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.

* * *

Language of the case: French.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia