- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-37/24: Action brought on 22 January 2024 — CB v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0037
62024TN0037
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/1881
11.3.2024
(Case T-37/24)
(C/2024/1881)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: CB (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of EPSO of 12 May 2023 confirming the decision not include the applicant on the reserve list for competition EPSO/AST/150/21-3;
—declare and rule that the defendant failed to comply with its obligations as regards transparency and compliance with the data protection rules;
—order the defendant to pay all of the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging illegality of the case study test because technical problems arose that adversely affected the applicant’s examination.
2.Second plea in law, alleging lack of transparency in relation to methods of assessment, illegal assessment of the applicant by artificial intelligence, lack of legal certainty and failure to state adequate reasons.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment and infringement of the principle of stability of the selection board.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging lack of transparency in relation to compliance with EU data protection legislation.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1881/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)