I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 352/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Stada Arzneimittel AG (Bad Vilbel, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ViruProtect’ — Application for registration No 16 295 511
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2018 in Case R 1886/2017-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.