I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Action for annulment - State aid - Act of Accession - Condition imposed on the beneficiary to limit its sales of flat products in the ‘enlarged EU’ - Commission letter interpreting the condition as applying to the Bulgarian and Romanian markets from the date of their accession - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)
2009/C 167/21
Language of the case: English
Applicant: US Steel Košice s.r.o. (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: E. Vermulst and S. Van Cutsem, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Gross and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Slovak Republic (represented by: J. Čorba, Agent)
Action for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 22 November 2006, inasmuch as it interprets the condition imposed on the applicant to limit its sales of flat products in the ‘enlarged EU’ as applying also, from 1 January 2007, to the Bulgarian and Romanian markets.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.US Steel Košice s.r.o. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.
3.The Slovak Republic shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.