- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-490/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2023 — Dr. Rudolf Liebe Nachfolger v EUIPO — Bit Beauty (ayuna LESS IS BEAUTY) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ayuna LESS IS BEAUTY — Earlier EU word mark AJONA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0490
62022TA0490
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/1156
(Case T-490/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark ayuna LESS IS BEAUTY - Earlier EU word mark AJONA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2023/1156)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Dr. Rudolf Liebe Nachfolger GmbH & Co. KG (Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany) (represented by: E. Stolz, U. Stelzenmüller, H. Meyerfeldt and J. Weiser, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bit Beauty, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Gallego Jiménez, E. Sanz Valls, P. Bauzá Martínez and Y. Hernández Viñes, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2022 (Case R 982/2021-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Dr. Rudolf Liebe Nachfolger GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(*)
OJ C 368, 26.9.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1156/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)