- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-57/17: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Pegasus v Parliament (Institutional law — European Parliament — Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation — Pre-financing set at 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant awarded — Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee — Financial Regulation — Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding — Proportionality — Equal treatment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0057
62017TA0057
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.8.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 301/30
(Case T-57/17) (*)
((Institutional law - European Parliament - Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation - Pre-financing set at 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant awarded - Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee - Financial Regulation - Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation - Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding - Proportionality - Equal treatment))
(2018/C 301/39)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Pegasus (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, C. Burgos and S. Alves, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Decision FINS-2017-31 of the European Parliament of 12 December 2016 concerning the award of a grant to the applicant, in so far as that decision restricts the pre-financing to 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant and makes its payment subject to the provision of a bank guarantee.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Pegasus to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2018:301