EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-440/24: Action brought on 23 August 2024 – Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale v SRB

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0440

62024TN0440

August 23, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/5844

7.10.2024

(Case T-440/24)

(C/2024/5844)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 11 June 2024 on the re-adoption of the decision on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund concerning the institutions mentioned in Annex I to that decision (SRB/ES/2024/20), including its annexes, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I, Annex II and Annex III thereto, concerns the applicant’s contribution;

order the SRB to pay the costs of the proceedings.

In the alternative, in the event that the Court should consider that the contested decision is legally non-existent due to the use of the incorrect official language by the SRB and that the action for annulment is therefore inadmissible on the ground that it is devoid of purpose, the applicant claims that the Court should:

declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent;

order the SRB to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on nine pleas in law, which are identical to those raised in Case T-437/24, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5844/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia