I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 445/27)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Fujifilm Recording Media GmbH (Kleve, Germany) (represented by: R. Härer, C. Schulze, C. Weber, H. Ranzinger und C. Gehweiler, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: iTernity GmbH (Freiburg, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘d:ternity’ — EU trade mark No 11 152 154
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 July 2018 in Case R 2324/2017-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—in the alternative, declare that there is no need to adjudicate on the dispute in the main proceedings;
—order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs incurred before the Court and the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.