I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 399/62)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, A. Lambrecht, C. Elkemann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: European Food SA (Păntășești, Romania)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark fitness — European Union trade mark No 2 470 326
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2018 in Case R 755/2018-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—dismiss the appeal against the Cancellation Division’s decision 5802 C of 18 October 2013;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.