- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-394/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — PN, QO, RP, SQ, TR v Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Citizenship of the European Union — Right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 3 — Beneficiaries — Incorrect transposition — Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law — Grant of social assistance as compensation for the damage suffered — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CB0394
62019CB0394
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/9
(Case C-394/19) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Citizenship of the European Union - Right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State - Directive 2004/38/EC - Article 3 - Beneficiaries - Incorrect transposition - Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law - Grant of social assistance as compensation for the damage suffered - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2021/C 44/12)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: PN, QO, RP, SQ, TR
Defendant: Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS)
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles (Brussels Labour Court (French-speaking), Belgium) by decision of 14 May 2019 is manifestly inadmissible.
(1) OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.