I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2021/C 368/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Copal Tree Brands, Inc. (Oakland, California, United States) (represented by: B. Niemann Fadani, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sumol + Compal Marcas SA (Carnaxide, Portugal)
Applicant of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark COPALLI — Application for registration No 17 955 499
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2021 in Case R 1581/2020-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 25 May 2021 in case R 1581/2020-2;
—annul the decision of the Opposition division of 29 May 2020 in Opposition no. B3075279;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement and incorrect application of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.