- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-209/13: Action brought on 18 April 2013 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0209
62013CN0209
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.6.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 171/22
(Case C-209/13)
2013/C 171/44
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: E. Jenkinson, S. Behzadi-Spencer, Agents, M. Hoskins QC, P. Baker QC, V. Wakefield, Barrister)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul Council Decision 2013/52/EU (1) authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax; and
—Require the Council to pay the United Kingdom’s costs of these proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
First plea in law, alleging that Council Decision 2013/52/EU is contrary to Article 327 TFEU because it authorizes the adoption of a financial transaction tax (‘FTT’) with extraterritorial effects which will fail to respect the competences, rights and obligations of the Non-Participating States.
Second plea in law, alleging that Council Decision 2013/52/EU is unlawful because it authorizes the adoption of an FTT with extraterritorial effects for which there is no justification in customary international law.
Third plea in law, alleging that Council Decision 2013/52/EU is contrary to Article 332 TFEU because it authorizes enhanced cooperation for an FTT, the implementation of which will inevitably cause costs to be incurred by the Non-Participating States.
* OJ L 22, p. 11