I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark WORLDLINK – Earlier national figurative mark LiNK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Restriction of services covered in the trade mark application – Identity of services – Similarity of signs – Articles 73 and 74 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 95-96, 101)
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 May 2004 (Case R 789/2002-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Link Interchange Network Ltd and Citigroup, Inc.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark WORLDLINK for goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 36 – Application No 111880
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Link Interchange Network Ltd
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
National figurative mark LiNK for goods in Class 36
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Application for registration dismissed for goods in Class 36: financial and monetary matters
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Citigroup, Inc. to pay the costs.