- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-234/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2012 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB (Appeals — Staff cases — EIB staff — Pensions — Contribution to the pension scheme — Dismissal of the action at first instance as manifestly inadmissible — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Lateness — Reasonable period of time)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0234
62011TA0234
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.7.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 227/19
(Case T-234/11 P) (1)
(Appeals - Staff cases - EIB staff - Pensions - Contribution to the pension scheme - Dismissal of the action at first instance as manifestly inadmissible - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Lateness - Reasonable period of time)
2012/C 227/30
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellants: Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and the 34 other members of the staff of the European Investment Bank whose names appear in the Annex to the judgment (represented by: B. Cortese and C. Cortese, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (represented by: C. Gómez de la Cruz and T. Gilliams, acting as Agents, assisted by P.-E. Partsch, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal against the Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 4 February 2011 in Case F-34/10 Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB ECR SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that order set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.dismisses the appeal;
2.orders Mr Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and the 34 other members of the staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) whose names appear in the Annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the EIB in these proceedings.
(1) OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.