- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-35/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Málaga (Spain) lodged on 17 January 2022 — Cajasur Banco, S. A. v JO and IM
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0035
62022CN0035
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.4.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 171/16
(Case C-35/22)
(2022/C 171/20)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Cajasur Banco, S. A.
Respondents: JO and IM
Questions referred
1.Is it contrary to the right to effective judicial protection and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to require that, before instituting legal proceedings, the consumer must first have issued an out-of-court demand for payment in order for the declaration as to the invalidity of a particular general condition of contract on grounds of unfairness to give rise to all of the compensatory effects (including the costs of the legal proceedings) associated with such invalidity, pursuant to Article 6(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts? (1)
2.Is it compatible with the right to full compensation and the effectiveness of European Union law and Article 6(1) of the aforementioned directive to make the imposition of costs (including legal fees) subject to a condition based on the existence of a prior out-of-court demand for payment issued by the consumer to the financial institution with a view to the removal of that term?
(1)
OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.