- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-615/11: Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2014 — Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Online games — Introduction in Denmark of taxes lower for online games than for casinos and gaming rooms — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid intended to facilitate the development of certain activities — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0615
62011TA0615
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.11.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 395/33
(Case T-615/11) (*)
((Action for annulment - State aid - Online games - Introduction in Denmark of taxes lower for online games than for casinos and gaming rooms - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Aid intended to facilitate the development of certain activities - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))
(2014/C 395/38)
Language of the case: Danish
Parties
Applicant: Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S (Aarhus, Denmark) (represented by: B. Jacobi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by M. Afonso and C. Barslev, subsequently by M. Afonso and L. Grønfeldt, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented initially by C. Vang, subsequently by V. Pasternak Jørgensen and lastly by C. Thorning, acting as Agents, and K. Lundgaard Hansen, lawyer); Republic of Malta (represented by: P. Grech and A. Buhagiar, acting as Agents); Betfair Group plc (London, United Kingdom) and Betfair International Ltd (Santa Venera, Malta) (represented by: O. Brouwer and A. Pliego Selie, lawyers); European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C.-D. Ehlermann, J. C. Heithecker and J. Ylinen, lawyers)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/140/EU of 20 September 2011 on the measure C 35/10 (ex N 302/10) which Denmark is planning to implement in the form of duties for online gambling in the Danish Gaming Duties Act (OJ 2012 L 69, p. 3).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Royal Scandinavian Casino Århus I/S, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission, Betfair Group plc, Betfair International Ltd and the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA).
3.Orders the Kingdom of Denmark and the Republic of Malta to bear their own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Danish
ECLI:EU:C:2014:140