EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-611/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 — Pirelli & C. SpA v European Commission, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Powers of the European Commission in the area of fines — Imputability of the infringement — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Obligation to state reasons — Fundamental rights — Beneficium ordinis seu excussionis — Unlimited jurisdiction)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0611

62018CA0611

October 28, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.12.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/6

(Case C-611/18 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Market allocation in connection with projects - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Powers of the European Commission in the area of fines - Imputability of the infringement - Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence - Obligation to state reasons - Fundamental rights - Beneficium ordinis seu excussionis - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(2020/C 433/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Pirelli & C. SpA (represented by: M. Siragusa and G. Rizza, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Malferrari, P. Rossi, C. Sjödin and T. Vecchi, acting as Agents), Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (represented initially by C. Tesauro and L. Armati, avvocati, subsequently by V. Roppo and P. Canepa, avvocati)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders Pirelli & C. SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

3.Orders Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl to bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.

ECLI:EU:C:2020:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia