EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-30/08: Action brought on 23 January 2008 — Winzer Pharma v OHIM — Oftaltech (OFTASIL)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0030

62008TN0030

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

JUDGMENT OF 6. 3. 2025 – CASE C-41/24 WALTHAM ABBEY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION

29.3.2008 *

(Action brought on 23 January 2008 — Winzer Pharma v OHIM — Oftaltech (OFTASIL))

(Case T-30/08)

(2008/C 79/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Dr. Robert Winzer Pharma GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: S. Schneller, Rechtsanwalt)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Oftaltech S.A. (L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain)

Forms of order sought

Annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2007 (R 599/2007-2) and the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 19 February 2007 (B 925 554);

rejection of Community trade mark application No 4 229 274 ‘OFTASIL’;

holding of oral proceedings;

an order that OHIM pays the costs of the proceedings;

in the alternative, a referral of the case back to OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Oftaltech S.A.

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative trade mark ‘OFTASIL’ for goods in Class 5 (application No 4 229 274)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘Ophtal’ for goods in Classes 5 and 10 (Community trade mark No 489 948), the word mark ‘Ophtal’ for goods in Class 5 (German trade mark No 800 702) and the word mark ‘OPHTAN’ for goods in Classes 5, 29 and 30 (German trade mark No 303 349 033)

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 40/94 (1) and of the principles to be applied under this provision to examine whether there is a likelihood of confusion.

* * *

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia