- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-330/24, Celní jednatelství Zelinka: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 6 May 2024 – Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o. v Generální ředitelství cel
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0330
62024CN0330
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/4954
19.8.2024
(Case C-330/24, Celní jednatelství Zelinka)
(C/2024/4954)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o.
Defendant: Generální ředitelství cel
Question referred
Must the term ‘omyl’ [error] in [the Czech version of] Article 116(7) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that a customs debt is to be reinstated only in the event that the repayment of customs duty occurred due to an unintentional act on the part of the customs authority, or can error under that article extend to an incorrect assessment by the customs authority as to the tariff classification of the goods?
—
(1) OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4954/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—