- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-646/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — eSky Group IP v EUIPO — Gröpel (e) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark e — Earlier international figurative mark e — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0646
62019TA0646
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.7.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 247/11
(Case T-646/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark e - Earlier international figurative mark e - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 247/17)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: eSky Group IP sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: P. Kurcman, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Gerhard Gröpel (Passau, Germany) (represented by: N. Maenz, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2019 (Case R 223/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Gröpel and eSky Group IP.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders eSky Group IP sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.