- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-449/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 21 July 2021 — Towercast v Autorité de la concurrence, Ministère de l’Économie
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0449
62021CN0449
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.11.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 452/9
(Case C-449/21)
(2021/C 452/09)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Towercast
Defendants: Autorité de la concurrence, Ministère de l’Économie
Question referred
Is Article 21(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (1) to be interpreted as precluding a national competition authority from regarding a concentration which has no Community dimension within the meaning of Article 1 of that regulation, is below the thresholds for mandatory ex ante assessment laid down in national law, and has not been referred to the European Commission under Article 22 of Regulation No 139/2004, as constituting an abuse of a dominant position prohibited by Article 102 TFEU, in the light of the structure of competition on a market which is national in scope?
(1) OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1.
Language of the case: French
* * *