- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-710/17: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato, Italy) — CCC — Consorzio Cooperative Costruzioni Soc. Cooperativa v Comune di Tarvisio (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public works contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 48(3) — Assessment and verification of the technical capacities of economic operators — National provision which cannot be regarded as a transposition of Directive 2004/18 — No direct and unconditional reference to EU law — No request based on the existence of a certain cross-border interest — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CA0710
62017CA0710
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 131/12
(Case C-710/17) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public works contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 48(3) - Assessment and verification of the technical capacities of economic operators - National provision which cannot be regarded as a transposition of Directive 2004/18 - No direct and unconditional reference to EU law - No request based on the existence of a certain cross-border interest - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2019/C 131/14)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: CCC — Consorzio Cooperative Costruzioni Soc. Cooperativa
Defendant: Comune di Tarvisio
Interveners: Incos Srl, RTI — Idrotermica F.lli Solera, Gabriele Indovina
Operative part of the judgment
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), by decision of 28 September 2017, is inadmissible.
(*) Language of the case: Italian.
* * *
(1) OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.