EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-345/24, AGCOM: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 10 May 2024 – Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA and Others

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0345

62024CN0345

May 10, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/4844

12.8.2024

(Case C-345/24, AGCOM)

(C/2024/4844)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM)

Respondents: BRT SpA, Federazione Italiana Trasportatori (FEDIT), Associazione Italiana dei Corrieri Aerei Internazionali (AICAI), DHL Express (Italy) Srl, TNT Global Express Srl, Fedex Express Italy Srl, United Parcel Service Italia Srl, Amazon Italia Transport Srl, Amazon Italia Logistica Srl, Amazon EU Sàrl

Questions referred

1.Does Regulation (EU) 2018/644 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 on cross-border parcel delivery services, with regard to the collection of information, apply as such only to cross-border delivery service providers or, in general, to all parcel delivery service providers, subject to specific exclusions relating to individual provisions?

2.If the answer to Question 1 is that it applies only to cross-border delivery service providers, does Directive 97/67/EC, or do the so-called ‘implied powers’, provide the legal basis for the national regulatory authorities to impose, in any event, on delivery service providers, even non-cross-border ones, general obligations to provide information?

3.If the answer to Question 2 is no, must the fact that Regulation (EU) 2018/644 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 does not apply to non-cross-border delivery providers be regarded as reasonable, non-discriminatory and in accordance with Articles 14, 114 and 169 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?

4.To what extent (including from the perspective of necessity and proportionality) can the national regulatory authority impose obligations to provide information on parcel delivery service providers and, in particular, is it possible to impose, on all providers without distinction, obligations to provide information concerning:

(i) the conditions applied to different types of customers;

(ii) the contracts which govern the relations between the individual undertaking that provides the parcel delivery service and the undertakings which in various ways, according to the specificities of the sector, contribute to providing that service;

(iii) the economic conditions and the legal protection afforded to workers employed in various capacities in providing the service?

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4844/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia