- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-329/20: Action brought on 29 May 2020 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendants (jewellery))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0329
62020TN0329
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.7.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 247/41
(Case T-329/20)
(2020/C 247/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: 4B Company Srl (Montegiorgio, Italy) (represented by: G. Brogi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Deenz Holding Ltd (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 2 100-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2020 in Case R 2449/2018-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division, granted the application to maintain Community design No 21 00-0001 in amended form and allowed the design in amended form to be included on the register and published in the Community Designs Bulletin, and, as a result, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 15 October 2018 in Case ICD 10 654;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement and misinterpretation of Article 25(6) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.