- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-191/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — HIT Trading and Berkman Forwarding v Commission (Customs Union — Importation of compact fluorescent lamps with integrated electronic ballasts (CFL-i) from Pakistan — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for remission of import duties — Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0191
62009TA0191
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.2.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 38/13
(Case T-191/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Customs Union - Importation of compact fluorescent lamps with integrated electronic ballasts (CFL-i) from Pakistan - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Application for remission of import duties - Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92)
2011/C 38/21
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: HIT Trading BV (Lelystad, Netherlands); and Berkman Forwarding BV (Barendrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: A.T.M. Jansen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Bouyon and H. van Vliet, Agents, assisted by Y. van Gerven, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 747 final of 12 February 2009, stating that the post-clearance entry in the accounts of certain import duties was justified and that the remission of such duties was not justified (File reference: REC 01/08).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the application;
2.Orders Hit Trading BV and Berkman Forwarding BV to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 180 of 1.8.2009