I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2023/C 121/16)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Oriflame Cosmetics AG (Schaffhausen, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Gerling and U. Pfleghar, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caramé Holding AG (Sulzbach, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of a figurative mark (Representation of a stylised O) — International registration designating the European Union No 1 303 496
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 December 2022 in Case R 938/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 4 April 2022 and refuse international registration designating the European Union No 1 303 496;
—Order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in addition to bearing their own costs.
—Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2007/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 10(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.