- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-109/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Schneider v EUIPO — Frutaria Innovation (frutania) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark frutania — Earlier EU figurative mark Frutaria — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0109
62022TA0109
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.9.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 338/19
(Case T-109/22)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark frutania - Earlier EU figurative mark Frutaria - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 338/24)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Markus Schneider (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: M. Bergermann and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Frutaria Innovation, SL, formerly Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas, SL (Saragossa, Spain) (represented by: J. Learte Álvarez and C. Anadón Giménez, lawyers)
Re:
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 December 2021 (Case R 1058/2017-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Markus Schneider to pay the costs.
OJ C 158, 11.4.2022.