- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-168/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Creaton South-East Europe v EUIPO — Henkel (CREATHERM) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CREATHERM — Earlier international word mark CERETHERM — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0168
62020TA0168
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 217/42
(Case T-168/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark CREATHERM - Earlier international word mark CERETHERM - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 217/55)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Creaton South-East Europe Kft. (Lenti, Hungary) (represented by: J. Muyldermans and P. Maeyaert, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 January 2020 (Case R 1090/2019-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Henkel and Creaton South-East Europe.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Creaton South-East Europe Kft. to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
(OJ C 191, 8.6.2020)
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140