Official Journal of the European Union

C series

—

C/2025/4066

28.7.2025

(Case T-385/25)

(C/2025/4066)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JP (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—annul the decision of 8 July 2024 not to grant the applicant’s request for reinstatement in the European Parliament Liaison Office in Washington DC;

—annul, in so far as necessary, the decision of 18 February 2025 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

—order the defendant to compensate the damages occurred and

—order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations with manifest error of assessment – Breach of Article 22c (1) of the Staff Regulations.

2.Second plea in law, alleging a failure to meet legitimate expectations – a breach of Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental rights and of the duty of care – a breach of the European Parliament’s Bureau Decision of 15 January 2018 on staff mobility.

—

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4066/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—