I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
26.8.2024
(C/2024/5080)
Language of the case: Romanian
Appellant on a point of law and defendant at first instance: Autoritatea Națională pentru Administrare și Reglementare în Comunicații
Respondent on a point of law and applicant at first instance: Telekom România Mobile Communications
Must Article 3 of Regulation [2015/2120] (1) be interpreted as meaning that a tariff option offered by a telecommunications undertaking which allows final customers who have accepted it to use all video-streaming services free of charge, independently of the service provider and regardless of whether or not they have the status of content partner of the telecommunications undertaking, is compatible with the obligations arising from that provision, without the data volume consumed by using those services being included in the monthly data allowance guaranteed by the mobile communications tariff, but with a limitation of the bandwidth for that type of content?
(1) Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (OJ 2015 L 310, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5080/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Romanian.