I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2023/C 179/104)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société d’équipements de boulangerie pâtisserie (Portes-Lès-Valence, France)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark BERTRAND PUMA La griffe boulangère — Application for registration No 18 046 533
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 January 2023 in Case R 2420/2020-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.