I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Word mark QUARTZ - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community figurative mark QUARTZ - Refusal to register - Similarity between goods - Likelihood of confusion - Appeal clearly inadmissible)
2009/C 282/32
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Apple Computer Inc. (represented by: M. Hart and N. Kearley, Solicitors)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo, Agent), TKS-Teknosoft SA
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 1 July 2008 in Case T-328/05 Apple Computer v OHIM, by which the Court dismissed the action brought by the applicant for the figurative mark ‘QUARTZ’ in respect of goods in classe 9 against decision R 416/2004-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 27 April 2005 dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division partially refusing registration of that mark in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the Community figurative mark ‘QUARTZ’ in respect of services in classes 9 and 42.
1.The appeal is dismissed.
(1) OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.