- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-29/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Vobro v EUIPO — Mieszko (CHERRY Passion) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CHERRY Passion — Earlier EU figurative mark MIESZKO PRALINES CHERRISSIMO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0029
62023TA0029
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/954
(Case T-29/23) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark CHERRY Passion - Earlier EU figurative mark MIESZKO PRALINES CHERRISSIMO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/954)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Vobro sp. z o.o. (Brodnica, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mieszko S.A., (Warsaw, Poland)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 November 2022 (Case R 2073/2021-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/954/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)