I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases T-226/09 and T-230/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(State aid - Partial exemption from the obligation to contribute to the Pension Protection Fund - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - State resources - Advantage - Selective nature - Adverse effect on competition - Effect on trade between Member States - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations - Obligation to state reasons - Putting into effect of the aid)
2013/C 325/33
Language of the case: English
Applicants: British Telecommunications (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Robert, M. Newhouse and T. Castorina, Solicitors, and by J. Holmes, Barrister, and H. Legge QC) (Case T-226/09) and BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd (London) (represented by: J. Derenne and A. Müller-Rappard, lawyers) (Case T-230/09)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and N. Khan, acting as Agents)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2009/703/EC of 11 February 2009 concerning the State aid C-55/2007 (ex NN 63/07, CP 106/06) implemented by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Public guarantee in favour of [British Telecommunications] (OJ 2009 L 242, p. 21).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the actions;
2.In Case T-226/09, orders British Telecommunications plc to pay the costs;
3.In Case T-230/09, orders BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.