EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-810/14: Action brought on 12 December 2014 — Portugal v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0810

62014TN0810

December 12, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/40

(Case T-810/14)

(2015/C 065/55)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, J. Arsénio de Oliveira and S. Nunes de Almeida, Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Declare invalid the notice of assessment submitted by the General Secretariat of the European Commission by letter 2014D/14507 of 6 October 2014.

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging appropriation of the powers of the European Union jurisdictional area by the Commission, thereby constituting a lack of competence.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the Treaties or of any rule of law relating to their application, as the act is based on an artificial division of the effects of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-292/1.

3.Third plea in law, alleging breach of res judicata, as the act was carried out in breach of the Treaties or of any rule of law relating to their application.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging breach of the principles of legal certainty, the stability of legal relations and legitimate expectations, recognised by EU law.

5.Fifth plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of the prohibition against double penalties, which precludes obtaining, through a new individual legal act, what could not be obtained previously by means of annulment judgments.

6.Sixth plea in law, alleging infringement of the division of powers between the Commission and the Member States, constituting a lack of competence, in that the Commission tried to restrict the right of Member States to determine a reasonable period for a provision to come into effect.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia