I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-219/20) (*)
(Civil service - Officials - Commission staff working for the EEAS - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Implied decision rejecting the request - Decision rejecting the complaint - Article 90 of the Staff Regulations - Competent Appointing Authority - Principle of sound administration)
(2021/C 490/41)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: JK (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 5 June 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint
The Court:
1.Annuls the implied decision of the European Commission of 5 June 2019 rejecting JK’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;
2.Orders the Commission to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by JK.
(*) Language of the case: French.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
* * *