I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
5.2.2024
(Case T-1144/23)
(C/2024/1107)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Enedo Oyj (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: H.-M. Elo and E. Hodge, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Enedis (Paris, France)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY — Application for registration No 18 159 736
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2023 in Case R 191/2023-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and reject the opposition;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1107/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)