I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal – Commission's refusal to bring infringement proceedings – Action for annulment and for damages – Manifest inadmissibility
Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility (Art. 225 EC; Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58(1), Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 7-10)
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2009 in Case T-249/09 Ségaud v Commission, by which that court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible and as quite unfounded in law the appellant’s action, first, for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 4 May 2009 refusing to bring infringement proceedings against the French Republic pursuant to Article 226 EC and, secondly, for compensation for the damage allegedly sustained as a result of that refusal.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Ségaud to bear his own costs.