EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-299/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Elf Aquitaine v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in sodium chlorate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA — Imputability of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Principle that penalties must fit the offence — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Presumption of innocence — Principle of sound administration — Principle of legal certainty — Misuse of powers — Fines — Aggravating circumstance — Deterrence — Mitigating circumstance — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TA0299

62008TA0299

May 17, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.6.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/19

(Case T-299/08) (<a id="ntc1-C_2011186EN.01001902-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2011186EN.01001902-E0001"> (<span class="super">1</span>)</a>)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in sodium chlorate - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA - Imputability of the infringement - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons - Principle that penalties must fit the offence - Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis - Presumption of innocence - Principle of sound administration - Principle of legal certainty - Misuse of powers - Fines - Aggravating circumstance - Deterrence - Mitigating circumstance - Cooperation during the administrative procedure - Significant added value)

2011/C 186/35

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Elf Aquitaine SA (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: É. Morgan de Rivery and S. Thibault-Liger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis, É. Gippini Fournier and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Principally, action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 2626 final of 11 June 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) EC and Article 53(1) of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) (Case COMP/38.695 — Sodium Chlorate), in so far as that decision relates to Elf Aquitaine and, in the alternative, action for annulment or reduction of the amounts of the fines imposed on that company in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Elf Aquitaine SA to pay the costs.

(<a id="ntr1-C_2011186EN.01001902-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2011186EN.01001902-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2008:272:TOC">OJ C 272, 25.10.2008</a>.)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia