EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Court of 20 October 1977. # Nippon Seiko KK and others v Council and Commission of the European Communities. # Case 119-77 R.

ECLI:EU:C:1977:166

61977CO0119

October 20, 1977
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61977O0119

European Court reports 1977 Page 01867

Parties

IN CASE 119/77 R

(1) NIPPON SEIKO K.K ., TOKYO ,

(2) NSK BEARINGS EUROPE LTD ., LONDON ,

(3) NSK KUGELLAGER GMBH , RATINGEN ,

(4) NSK FRANCE S.A ., CLICHY ,

REPRESENTED BY JEREMY LEVER , QUEEN ' S COUNSEL , OF GRAY ' S INN , DAVID VAUGHAN , BARRISTER , OF THE INNER TEMPLE , LONDON , AND MESSRS COWARD CHANCE , SOLICITORS , LONDON , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CHAMBERS OF J . C . WOLTER , 2 , RUE GOETHE ,

APPLICANTS

V COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER , PETER BRUCKNER , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF MR VAN DEN HOUTEN , EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK , PLACE DE METZ ,

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER , ROBERT CASPER FISCHER , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF MARIO CERVINO , COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , JEAN MONNET BUILDING ,

DEFENDANTS ,

Grounds

1 THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION HAVE NOT CONTESTED THAT THE COMPETENT BRITISH , FRENCH AND GERMAN CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES ARE INSISTING THAT THE OUTSTANDING PAYMENTS REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION NO 1778/77 SHALL BE MADE FORTHWITH . NOR HAVE THEY CONTESTED THAT THE SUBSIDIARIES WILL INCUR THE ADDITIONAL CHARGES REFERRED TO BY THE APPLICANTS IN THE EVENT OF THE DISMISSAL OF THE LATTER ' S APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES .

2 IT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH CONCLUSIVELY WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE PRESENT PROCEEDINGS , WHETHER , IN THE EVENT OF THE APPLICANTS ' BEING SUCCESSFUL IN THE MAIN ACTION , THIS EXPENDITURE WOULD BE WHOLLY RECOUPED .

3 HAVING REGARD TO THE PROBABLE DURATION OF THE PROCEDURE IN THE MAIN ACTION , CHARGES AT THE RATE QUOTED BY THE APPLICANTS CANNOT BE REGARDED AS NEGLIGIBLE .

4 ON THE OTHER HAND THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ADOPTION OF THE INTERIM MEASURES APPLIED FOR WOULD CAUSE APPRECIABLE DETRIMENT TO THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY IF THE SUBSIDIARIES WERE TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING SECURITY IN THE OUTSTANDING SUMS TO BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION NO 1778/77 AND IF THE APPLICANTS WERE TO BE UNSUCCESSFUL IN THE MAIN ACTION .

5 THE APPLICANTS HAVE THUS SUBSTANTIATED THE CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO URGENCY AND THE FACTUAL AND LEGAL GROUNDS ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE CASE FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANTS OF THE ABOVEMENTIONED ARTICLE 3 ( ARTICLE 83 ( 2 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE ) AS FAR AS CONCERNS THE SUMS OWED BY THE SUBSIDIARIES UNDER ARTICLE 3 BUT NOT YET PAID BY THEM .

6 TO THAT EXTENT THEREFORE THE APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANTS OF THE SAID ARTICLE MUST BE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE FINAL JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF NSK AND OTHERS V COUNCIL AND COMMISSION ( CASE 119/77 ) ON CONDITION THAT AND FOR SO LONG AS THE SUBSIDIARIES CONTINUE TO PROVIDE SECURITY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR OBLIGATION IN THE OUTSTANDING AMOUNTS WHICH THEY ARE REQUIRED TO PAY IN PURSUANCE OF ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION NO 1778/77 .

7 THE DECISION WITH REGARD TO COSTS SHOULD BE RESERVED FOR THE FINAL JUDGMENT IN CASE 119/77 .

Operative part

ON THOSE GROUNDS ,

THE PRESIDENT ,

AS AN INTERLOCUTORY DECISION , HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :

1 . THE APPLICATION TO NIPPON SEIKO K.K ., NSK BEARINGS EUROPE LTD ., NSK KUGELLAGER GMBH AND NSK FRANCE S.A . OF ARTICLE 3 OF COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1778/77 IS SUSPENDED UNTIL THE FINAL JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF NSK AND OTHERS V COUNCIL AND COMMISSION ( CASE 119/77 ) AS FAR AS CONCERNS THE SUMS OWED BY THE SUBSIDIARIES UNDER THE SAID ARTICLE BUT NOT YET PAID BY THEM , ON CONDITION THAT AND FOR SO LONG AS THE SUBSIDIARIES CONTINUE TO PROVIDE SECURITY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR OBLIGATION IN THE SAID AMOUNTS ;

2 . COSTS ARE RESERVED FOR THE FINAL JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF NSK AND OTHERS V COUNCIL AND COMMISSION ( CASE 119/77 ).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia