EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-490/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Vanhoudt v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Rejection of application — Appointment of another candidate — Obligation to state reasons — Irregularity in the recruitment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Liability)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0490

62021TA0490

December 14, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/41

(Case T-490/21)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Rejection of application - Appointment of another candidate - Obligation to state reasons - Irregularity in the recruitment procedure - Manifest error of assessment - Liability)

(2023/C 63/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Patrick Vanhoudt (Gonderange, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 16 December 2020, by which it rejected his application for a position at level 6/5-D/E, and of the decision by which the EIB appointed the successful candidate to that position, and, second, compensation for the harm which he claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Mr Patrick Vanhoudt to pay the costs.

(1)

OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia