I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-230/20) (*)
(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution PNB Banka - Proposal of the national competent authority to withdraw authorisation - Insolvency decision in respect of PNB Banka - Reasonable time - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality)
(2023/C 35/54)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: PNB Banka AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta, F. Bonnard and V. Hümpfner, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere, J. Davidoviča and E. Bārdiņš, acting as Agents)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 17 February 2020, ECB-SSM-220-LVPNB-1, WHD-2019-0016, withdrawing its authorisation as a credit institution.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders PNB Banka AS to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB), including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief;
3.Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.