- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-372/09: Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Visti Beheer v OHIM — Meister (GOLD MEISTER) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community trade mark GOLD MEISTER — Earlier national and Community trade marks MEISTER — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0372
62009TA0372
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 139/17
(Case T-372/09)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark GOLD MEISTER - Earlier national and Community trade marks MEISTER - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 139/32
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Visti Beheer BV (Helmond, The Netherlands) (represented by: A. Herbetz, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Meister & Co. AG (Wollerau, Switzerland) (represented by: V. Knies, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 June 2009 (Case R 1465/2008-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Meister & Co. AG and Visti Beheer BV
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Visti Beheer BV to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM;
3.Orders Meister & Co. AG to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.