- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-297/10: Action brought on 8 July 2010 — DBV v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0297
62010TN0297
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.9.2010
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 246/37
(Case T-297/10)
()
2010/C 246/63
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: DBV Deutscher Brennstoffvertrieb Würzburg GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: C. Rudolph and A. Günther, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
—declare void Commission Regulation (EU) No 404/2010 of 10 May 2010 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant is challenging Regulation (EU) No 404/2010, by which the Commission imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China.
As a basis for its action, the applicant first submits that there has been a breach of essential procedural requirements and of the rights of the defence in that, in the course of the procedure prior to adoption of the contested regulation, the applicant was not informed or given a hearing, with the result that it had no opportunity to defend its interests and set out its views.
Second, the applicant contends that there was a defective determination of the facts and an abuse of discretionary power. It submits in this regard that the background to the case was misrepresented and incorrectly investigated. The applicant argues that no account was taken of, for instance, the higher exchange rate of the dollar in the interim or of the increased prices of crude oil. The applicant further submits, in connection with its allegation of abuse of discretionary power, that the Commission failed to have regard for the principle of proportionality. An abuse of discretionary power and breach of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 also lie, in the applicant’s view, inter alia in the fact that no suitable information was collected in the course of the investigations to establish differentiated duties.
*
Commission Regulation (EU) No 404/2010 of 10 May 2010 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2010 L 117, p. 64).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2009 L 343, p. 51).
* * *